Melissus of samos biography definition and example
If it were not one thing, it would limit some other thing. For, if it came into being, necessarily, before its generation, there was nothing; so, if there were nothing, nothing at all would come from nothing. In fragment 6 Melissus connects an eternal existence and the quality of being unlimited. Secondary [ edit ]. Life and Work Melissus of Samos fl.
Anaxagoras Archelaus Metrodorus of Lampsacus. Melissus argues that, because what-is is unlimited, it must also be one, because if it were more than one it would have limits namely, the boundaries between what-is and the other existing objects. McKirahan offers an interesting interpretation for what Melissus may have been arguing. Melissus contends that The One is unlimited.
Melissus of Samos. Life [ edit ]. Gorgias Callicles Lycophron Dionysodorus Euthydemus more His argument is clearer and more concise than the one provided by Parmenides. Schofield approximates his birth as ca.
Melissus of Samos - World History Encyclopedia
Like Parmenides, he claims that Being is one, ungenerated, indestructible, indivisible, changeless, motionless and the same. Ancient philosophy. Eternal [ edit ]. Except of a philosopher, he was a naval commander, famous for his victories especially against the Athenians in BC. Little is known about his life, except that he was the commander of the Samian fleet in the Samian War.
In the Diels-Kranz numbering system for fragments of pre-Socratic philosophy , Melissus is number External links [ edit ]. Aristotle, Physics, a32 A Philosophy [ edit ]. On Aristotle Physics 1. Authority control databases. The physical doctrines ascribed to Melissus by Philoponus, Stobceus, Epiphanius , and others do not seem to have been held by him.
Wikiquote Wikisource Wikidata item.
Melissus of samos biography definition and example: Melissus Of Samos (flourished 5th century
If The One underwent any kind of change whatsoever, it would become different and thus would no longer be unified or whole. The existence of a changeless, motionless, eternal present is an arguable position as Time, by its nature, is merely made by change and motion and that, there would exist no such thing as Time if there were no change in quality or quantity ; however, the existence of a changeless, motionless, infinite succession of moments is a much more difficult position to defend as moments are distinguished from one another by the change in quality or quantity of the one space that they exist within, otherwise, there would have been an infinite number of moments of the same quality and quantity, which is, in actuality, one continuous moment as Parmenides argued.
Ancient Greek schools of philosophy.